Written by Peter Li-Chang Kuo
(Chinese)
Since President Trump returned to the White House on January 20, he
has been fully committed to implementing his MAGA agenda. Two major strategies
are “Stop Outsourcing” and “Made in America.”
He announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on April 2 to reduce the U.S. trade
deficit.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that the Trump
administration is especially focused on the top 15 trading partners that both
impose high tariffs on the U.S.
and maintain large trade volumes—these countries are labeled “The Dirty 15.” According to Reuters, America’s top 15
trading partners include Mexico, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, South Korea,
Taiwan, Vietnam, the UK, India, the Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, France, and
Brazil—Taiwan ranks 7th. Among the top 10 countries with which the U.S. has the
largest trade deficits are China, Mexico, Vietnam, Ireland, Germany, Taiwan,
Japan, South Korea, Canada, and India—Taiwan ranks 6th, and all are part of “The Dirty 15.”
Bessent noted that on April 2, President Trump would assign each
trade partner a reciprocal tariff rate, based on their own tariff levels,
non-tariff barriers, currency manipulation practices, and other factors.
However, such tariffs could still be adjusted through negotiation to avoid
forming hard tariff walls.
On April 2, President Trump officially announced from the White
House a 32% reciprocal tariff on Taiwan, plus a 10% base tariff,
sparking widespread discussion. When the market opened on April 7, there were
only sell orders, no buy orders—media described the stock market as “a river of blood.”
On April 7, I wrote a letter to President Trump, explaining that Taiwan has always helped America, never
stolen from it. Taiwanese small business owners said, “New Zealand’s tariff is only 10%, maybe we should just emigrate there!”
Beyond the stock market reaction, an exodus is brewing. In the letter, I listed
specific examples of Taiwan’s
contributions to the U.S.:
1) In 1966, I helped an American develop precision “eyelet” (known as “Hardome”),
helping him win a NASA contract—without charging a penny, indirectly aiding America in the
space race.
2) In 1979, I helped Americans develop satellite
receivers, laying the foundation for Reaganomics.
3) In 1982, I saved the Barbie brand without ever
requesting compensation from Ms. Ruth Handler.
4) From 1986 to 1997, we invented contactless
semiconductors. Though the U.S.
was absent throughout, American corporations later profited enormously—e.g.,
Disney, IBM, VISA.
5) In 2006, after observing failed investments in
PDAs, I proposed satellite support at the APEC CEO Summit. In 2007, Steve Jobs
visited my office in Santa Clara, and I shared
with him the concept of a satellite-supported smart communicator, which led to
the Apple iPhone, bringing vast value and a still-growing derivative value
chain to the U.S.
Given Taiwan’s
difficult international position, after the ROC withdrew from the UN in 1971,
many talented people fled. In 1972, to help a client transform, I developed
ultra-fine wires, deflection yokes, and phenolic insulation boards (which later
supported PCB production). In 1974, I founded Cheng Kuang Precision Industrial
Co., Ltd. Premier Chiang Ching-Kuo visited and encouraged me to assist the
government with “citizen diplomacy,” which led to
sister-city ties with San Jose,
California. When I later visited
Silicon Valley, I met Steve Jobs, then struggling to start up, while I had
already been praised by President Chiang as “the
father of Taiwan’s
precision industry.”
Two years ago, I visited 40
Wall Street to meet you and shared ideas on “Investing in America”
(IIA) and building a Technical Education System, which I believe are essential
to achieving MAGA. For 40 years, the U.S. followed a logic of “buy from
wherever is cheapest,” and lost its practical capabilities. I proposed setting
up 1 to 10 Economy Institutes (EI) in each state, where seed consultants would
support local MSMEs and help revive a production-based society. As President
Reagan once said, “If America is to be strong, its
manufacturing must thrive.”
When I interviewed President Lee Teng-hui, he recalled that Chiang
Ching-Kuo instructed that Taiwan
must upgrade its industries. During Lee’s 12-year administration, TSMC still
struggled, but the government supported it unconditionally. We know that Morris
Chang left Texas Instruments in 1983, and only after 1984 did IT evolve to give
birth to the IBM 5550 PC. Chang did not bring modern advanced chip tech from
the U.S.—TSMC’s success came
entirely from the love and support of Taiwan’s public and private
sectors.
On March 3, TSMC announced in the White House an additional US$100
billion investment, totaling US$165 billion, triggering anxiety in
Taiwan—people realized that what Taiwan had spent decades cultivating was not a
mountain, not a shield, but a sheep with legs, ready to walk away.
Taiwan
has never sought to take advantage of the U.S. On the contrary, we have
played a vital role in strengthening U.S. industry, ensuring global
supply chain security, and promoting economic prosperity. Recent unfair
rhetoric and policies toward Taiwan
risk undermining a relationship built on mutual trust, respect, and shared
democratic values. I urged you to understand: “Taiwan is not a rival to be punished, but a partner to be
cherished.”
On April 2, your announcement of a 32% reciprocal tariff and 10%
base tariff struck Taiwan’s
already thin-margin industries like a nuclear bomb. The nation felt as though
it had returned to 1972. Some are considering emigrating to New Zealand,
where the tariff is only 10%—leaving a 22% margin to survive (32% – 10% = 22%).
Mr. President, I must tell you: Taiwan now faces a crisis of exodus
and broken supply chains. For 60 years in industry, I have always supported the
U.S., even in global forums
advocating for “IIA-TES,” because I believe
when America thrives, Taiwan
prospers too. I saw your email saying, “Peter
Li-Chang, I need your advice!” So I must tell you plainly: Taiwan can only bear a reciprocal tariff of 10%,
same as New Zealand.
This would help avoid the crisis of “exodus and broken supply chains” and
enable us to continue providing critical support to America.
Soon after the letter was sent, President Trump responded by
lowering the tariff to 10%, with a caveat: “Within 90
days, bilateral negotiations must be held to determine the final tariff rate.”
Today is July 7, and the 90-day deadline has arrived.
留言
張貼留言